Tuesday, 13 October 2009

Time Travel Tuesday: Forever - Judy Blume

(At I Was A Teenage Book Geek, Tuesdays are for time travel. Every week, I’ll delve into the YA bookshelves of years gone by and review a book that most definitely isn’t a new release. It might not even be a recent release. It might be five years old, or ten, or twenty. So that’s the deal: I’ll read it, and let you know whether I think it’s worth you reading it too. The book won’t necessarily be about time travel. Although it might be.)

I was fourteen when copies of Judy Blume’s Forever began to circulate among the girls in my class, who all seemed to have decided at the same time that they wanted to read this book now. Never one to be left behind, I decided I’d have to read it too. I wasn’t sure why, but hey - I’d enjoyed Tales of a Fourth Grade Nothing. My BFF, ever loyal, promised I could borrow her library copy before it was due back, in exchange for my mortal soul (or the latest Francine Pascal, whichever). And then she clued me in: Forever was a book about 'doing it'. Okaaay. Did I want to read a book about doing it? Not especially. But everybody else was doing it - I mean, reading about doing it - so I figured I should.

What I found was a novel that somehow managed to tread a perfectly fine line in its depiction of heroine Katherine’s first love: always frank, never straying into transparently preachy or worryingly irresponsible. It answered all the questions that I didn’t want to ask my mother, in pretty much the way that my mother would have wanted them answered. It also clarified for me that at fourteen, I did not want to be Katherine. Not for quite some time. If ever.

So, the reread. Here's the thing: it wasn't what I expected. I was surprised to find that I just don’t like the dynamic of Katherine and Michael’s relationship, and that's a major stumbling block. Michael is the more experienced of the two, and although he does pretty well at respecting Katherine’s initial decision to wait until she’s ready, he does eventually start to pester her a little - and on one occasion pesters into going further than she says she wants to. Katherine is certainly not portrayed as regretting what happens, and I’m inclined to think that the pestering / relenting is really about expected gender roles in the seventies, when Forever was written. Still, I just don’t like it. And since it’s hard to love this book without investing in the love between Katherine and Michael, the reread fell flat for me.

On the other hand, there are some awesome aspects of Forever that I'd completely forgotten about. Katherine's genius little sister, a talented artist and chef, is definitely my favourite character. I also loved the fact that Katherine's grandmother sends her a bunch of informational leaflets about staying safe and making responsible decisions. And yep, Katherine and Michael meet at a fondue party. A goddamn fondue party. How seventies is that?

Verdict: Yep, I feel let down. But it's my own fault. If Forever has a message, it's that your first love probably won't last forever, and probably shouldn't. No matter how sure you may be that this is the one, you're going to grow and change and meet other books people. Now Judy Blume's taught me that twice over.

8 comments:

B.A.M. Book Reviews said...

I read this book a few years ago and I really didnt like it. It just wasnt the book for me, I agree with you when you talk about their relationship. People say they love it and some people say they hate it. I just really dont want to reread it again. Not my thing. But on a happy not, great review! It was really nice reading the 'past' and the 'present'. ha.

-Arielle

Rhiannon Hart said...

"If Forever has a message, it's that your first love probably won't last forever, and probably shouldn't."

That was my takeaway message from the book, and it's a goddamn good one!

Luisa said...

Oh, interesting that it didn't stand up to your re-reading. I re-read it recently and I'm still in awe of Judy Blume's writing, which completely caught my imagination as a teenager (well, at around 11 or 12!). I definitely noticed details I'd forgotten, like you said, including the minor characters like Sybil, the girl who represented the 'bad' side of female sexuality. By the way, there's a great blog called "Avenging Sybil", based on this character: http://avengingsybil.typepad.com/avengingsybil/2004/04/teaser.html . Just in case you're interested!

I loved reading your post. Thanks!

Tena said...

OMG! What girl could ever forget the first time she got her hands on a copy of Forever! Thinking back I was probably a little young to be reading this book, I was in the 7th grade! HA HA HA!
What a fun trip, thanks for the memories

celi.a said...

Seriously great review. I *somehow* missed reading Forever, but there were other books that fulfilled the same function. I feel like I need to read this now... :) Again, wonderful post!

brizmus said...

what a great idea! Time traveler Tuesday - I like it! :-)
Like celi.a, I somehow MISSED this book the first time around. Everyone else was reading it,but not me. And I didn't really have another book that fulfilled the same function.
This was a great post, and, despite your disappointment the second time around, I have now been inspired to go back and read this book. Finally.

Katie said...

I'm glad I can finally see your Judy Blume posts, haha. I loved Judy Blume as a teen, but "Forever" was one I didn't find until I was an adult. I still can't believe it didn't get passed to me in a fit of giggles from a friend.

Love this series. You and I had very similar reading tastes!

Lauren said...

Luisa: thanks for the link. That's an *awesome* mission statement for a blog, isn't it?